New research in the journal PLOS Climate has estimated that by eliminating mobile bottom fishing it could reduce seabed carbon disturbance by 27-67%.

Below is an extract from the article abstract:

‘Mobile bottom fishing using trawls and dredges may cause significant reductions in seabed sediment organic carbon stores, limiting the oceanic carbon sink. Although uncertainties remain about the fate of disturbed carbon, protecting the most important and highly disturbed seabed carbon sinks for climate change mitigation represents a sensible precautionary policy.

Using spatial modelling of best available datasets relating to seabed carbon stocks and fishing disturbance in the UK Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), we estimate the cumulative disturbance of organic carbon by mobile bottom fishing to be 109 Mt per year.

Areas with high carbon stocks and disturbance are geographically restricted enabling identification of potential priority areas for precautionary carbon management and/or future research.

By targeting areas with the highest 1%, 5% and 10% of carbon values, while also accounting for fisheries displacement, we examined three management levels ranging from 3–12% of the area of the EEZ. These areas encompass between 7–29% of organic carbon stocks.

If all mobile bottom fishing disturbance in priority areas was eliminated it would reduce seabed carbon disturbance across the EEZ by 27–67%. Eliminating this fishing effort would be estimated to affect fisheries landings worth between £55m and £212m per year.

In contrast, if all mobile bottom fishing was displaced from priority areas to other areas within the study region, our modelling predicts net reductions of organic carbon disturbance between 11% and 22%.

Further research is needed to quantify how much of this carbon is remineralised following disturbance and therefore the magnitude of carbon emissions/savings. We also find that to offset the carbon and financial impacts of fisheries displacement, complementary management will be necessary to protect more carbon, including gear modifications to reduce seabed disturbance, overall effort reductions, and incentives to switch to alternative fishing methods.’

The full journal article in PLOS Climate can be read here.