The jury’s out on River Ouseburn future

Ouseburn Citizens’ Jury has taken place in the North East and will help inform the Environment Agency’s future water management plans. An innovative project to involve communities in decisions about the future of their local river has taken place in the North East. The first of its kind in the country, Ouseburn Citizens’ Jury is made up of members of the public and looked at what a ‘thoroughly modern river’ should be.

The jury, which took place at the end of January and was run by an independent facilitator on behalf of the Environment Agency, debated local issues, shared ideas and questioned environmental experts on all aspects of the water environment. The findings from the jury will help inform the Environment Agency’s future water management plans. And as a direct result of the project, the Environment Agency and Northumbrian Water are developing a potential bid to Ofwat’s Innovation Fund to help finance an innovative partnership led through education in the local area.

Catherine Saxon, Area Director of the Environment Agency in the North East, said:   Protecting and improving England’s rivers, lakes and streams is essential to ensuring we have clean and plentiful water now and in the future. We are facing some tough challenges, particularly from climate change and population growth. We need to work with everyone who uses, and is responsible for, water, across all sectors of society, to ensure the needs of all are reflected in our future plans.

Citizens’ juries are an excellent way of gaining views from the wider public and we greatly value the input of everyone who has taken part. The Ouseburn jury listened to evidence from a broad range of environmental experts, including Northumbrian Water, Woolsington Parish Council, the National Farmers’ Union, Newcastle City Council and the Tyne Rivers’ Trust.

The final six recommendations from the Ouseburn Citizens’ Jury include better education, appropriate and fair legislation and incentives for behaviour change, improved funding for improvements, more action to manage pollution, a co-ordinated partnership approach to changes, and a better balance between development and wildlife.

Click here to read more

No Comment

Comments are closed.